Parents guardians of the minor In this sense the first component of the virtue of prudence implies that Carter acted from a first fundamental decision that of serving society not as an activist or a collaborator of the United Nations to operate the aid but to contribute from the trench of photojournalism in reporting the facts accounting for situations responsibly and informing public opinion to obtain good from the spread truth. Carter decided at one point in his career that his job his duty was to operate the camera.
This photographic shot was not the product of an e-commerce photo editing occurrence or an isolated event but rather an act continued over a decade where Kevin Carter gave an account of the events with his camera no matter how horrific they were. A Yes we find that this continuing decision is a genuine operation of the will not an occurrence. It is a real habit that he has been forging that of being an objective measured photographer who reflects the reality of the facts.
Media Ethics And the specific operation of taking the photograph everything indicates that he did not take the photo to make fun of nor to decontextualize the situation of the person in the painting nor of the African situation in generators of Sudan in particular. The act is not bad in itself that is informing public opinion is an act oriented to the good if we think that it moves not only the general public but also world leaders to act in cases of injustice such as what happened with the famine of Sudan intentionally provoked by an extremist government.